Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.73 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
