Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
