Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
