Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.22 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
