Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
