Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
