Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
