Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
