Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
