Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC

Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Spinning

44.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

Spinning

46.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.72 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag7kg / 15.43 lbs

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €33.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Conclusion

Both Shimano Catana 4000 RC and Shimano Sahara 500 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 4000 RC offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 500 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Catana 4000 RC?

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

For 8.4 out of 10 (7kg / 15.43 lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques