Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona  2500 SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 SFI
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 6000SS, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-605
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI offers a weight of 245g / 8.64oz, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables