Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
