Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73cm / 28.74 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Delphin REDIX?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX
