Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). Still, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI holds its own with strengths like a weight of 245g / 8.64oz and a line retrieve per crank of 73cm / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
