Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs). Still, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a weight of 245g / 8.64oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
