Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
