Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
