Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
