Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Spinning

52.60 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 SFI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

82.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio5.6:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight675g / 23.81oz

Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €269.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size10000HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/300

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.26 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles