Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Spinning

63.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Penn Battle III

Spinning

69.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs

Weight785g / 27.7oz

Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €127.60
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000 HS
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI offers a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Battle III?

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish