Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI offers a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
