Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Spinning

63.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Shimano Cardiff XR

Spinning

86.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio6.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SHG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Conclusion

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.5 out of 10) and total score (8.63 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.