Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
