Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
