Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.49 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
