Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 500 FI offers a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
