Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 500 FI offers a gear ratio of 5.6:1, while Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
