Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 500 FI offers a gear ratio of 5.6:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
