Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 500 FI offers a gear ratio of 5.6:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
