Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX
