Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (5.56 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 5.6:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX