Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (5.57 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 5.6:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
