Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.87 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
- Solid value at €668.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
