Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €199.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
