Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.36 out of 10) and weight (250g / 8,82oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Exceptional value at €230.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious feeder and match anglers and pros
Similar comparisons
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX