Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.44 out of 10) and weight (300g / 10,58oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Exceptional value at €229.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious feeder and match anglers and pros
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
