Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €22.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
