Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and weight (275g / 9,7oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Daiwa RX LT?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €32.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
