Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €29.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
