Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin SHARX 6000X

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 6000X and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin SHARX 6000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
