Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and total score (7.64 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
- Decent value at €60.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X
