Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara 500 FI offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Decent value at €62.00, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
