Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 8000 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (150g / 5,29oz). While Shimano Sedona 8000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 8000 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
- 8.9 out of 10 (94cm / 37.00 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
