Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24.25lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 8000 FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 8000 FI and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24.25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
