Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona 8000 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 8000 FI holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94cm / 37.00 inch and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 8000 FI and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
