Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Spinning

58.70 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.97 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €48.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000 HGS
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues