Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €48.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000 HGS
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 4000-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-401
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €98.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX - Fishingbenchmark