Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Spinning

58.70 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.97 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €48.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000 HGS
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8 out of 10) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.