Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.72 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.0:1 and a weight of 215g / 7.58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
