Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa TANASENSOR

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Spinning

58.70 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.97 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €48.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000 HGS
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Daiwa TANASENSOR

Multireels

69.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.63 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio4.3:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Conclusion

Daiwa TANASENSOR edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.63 out of 10) and the total score (6.97 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 6.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.